Public Safety Reporting Tools
Aegis is Greek and over time has come to mean the following in English: the protection, backing, or support of a particular person or organization.
The AEGIS Reports ™ system was Born in Battle. Meaning the documentation, Federal Act, Statutory Law, Code of Federal Regulations, Industry Code and Professional Ethics Violations were re-searched as the violations were occurring on several related cases consisting of multiple millions of assets being misappropriated due to the exploitation of 3 vulnerable women (see example to the right and below). The documenting, evidence gathering, witness testimony, expert witness analysis, recordings, concealment of both legal documents & critical medical diagnosis, contradicting court motions as additional means to cover crimes and repeating patterns on each case formed the basis for the AEGIS Reports ™ methodology. What this means is that AEGIS Reports ™ are practical and not based on theorized hypotheticals proposed by a software development team.
The AEGIS Reports ™ system is the logistic, trend analysis, quantitative and qualitative circumstances analysis of the VP TASK FORCE ™ public safety tools – integrated software Suite. The synergistic approach of each software tool alerts citizens of those whom present a public safety risk by their repeated exploitation of vulnerable persons and all citizens affected by unethical business practices, violations of facility or professional standards. This includes the elderly, those with disabilities, children, victims of domestic violence, sexual harassment, bullying and related crime. The data convergence system also profiles and tracks offender behavior specific to white-collar ethical violations, civil breeches, compliance law violations, related crimes and collusion networks.
COMPLEX QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
AEGIS REPORTS ™ – Collusion Comparative Report Example
Matter Fact & Matter of Law Foundations.
The AEGIS Reports ™ system compiles complex evidence, discerns repeating patterns in relation to both matters of facts and matters of law, ethical violations industry codes, federal acts and related established regulatory guidelines. In other words, meaning that points of fact (evidence) are points of truths that are established as irrefutable truths referenced to facts (direct evidence, circumstantial evidence, documentary evidence, testimonial evidence) and inferences arising from those facts. The matters are distinct from a question of law, which must be answered by applying relevant legal principles, established professional ethical violations, industry codes, federal acts and related established regulatory guidelines. The AEGIS Reports ™ system integrates both matter of fact and matter a law data and displays this information in a clear straightforward matter using graphs, diagrams, testimony and the use of technology to simplify the voluminous accounts of complex and often intentionally manipulated subject matter. The AEGIS Reports™ reporting system identifies manipulated subject matter such as blame shifting, related tu quoque techniques and other logical fallacies white collar perpetrators use to deceive, deflect, debase and deny culpability
AEGIS REPORTS ™ EXAMPLE:
12 Point; 3 Vulnerable Person Estate Exploitation – Collusion Comparative Diagram Report
1) Repeating exploitation patterns on 3 rural area vulnerable person multi-million dollar estates. Abuse & exploitation resulting from estate planning for elderly women with debilitating physical conditions & neurocognitive disorders. Each estate involved illicit estate transfers substantially at odds with benefactors long-held estate disposition plans prior to their infirmities, cognitive disorders/Alzheimer’s & dependence on abusive family caretakers working with rural area network of estate drafting, consulting & guardianship attorneys, neurocognitive clinical evaluators, medical advisors and court visitor.
2) Shortly after aging or health misfortunates the unscrupulous family member guilefully usurps control of the vulnerable persons estate documents with assistance of new estate drafters and clandestine meeting where the vulnerable benefactor had been pressured, confused and misinformed to sign POAs.
3) New estate planning attorney and new estate plan or not aware of the new advisor’s motives to cease immediate control of their estate, in order to change the disposition to substantially transfer the bulk of their estate the new fiduciary-POA-caretaker-trustee with the assistance of new legal advisors/estate drafters due to their debilitating physical conditions and mental cognitive diagnosis.
4) New POA(s), estate planning attorneys and consulting advisors initiate a series of rapid estate changes in clandestine meetings while vulnerable person was restricted access to trusted family and pressured to sign obfuscating POAs, Trust, Trusts amendments, TEDRA agreements and/or Wills.
5) Ineptly/illicitly drafted estate documents tactically drafted to interplay off of other estate documents such as POAs, drafted appearing and disappearing trust professions to substantially alter the infirm and memory impaired dependent vulnerable persons long-estate disposition intentions.
6) Repeating violations of third parties cover ups contradicting motions, the peculiar nation or motive of motions and/or timing of motions that may be in violations of IPRC especially considering health and medical circumstances of AIP (3 near deaths in one year periods while estate planning and transferring millions in assets to caretaker-POA-Trustee-landlord) , mediation deception/fraud, joint account transfers, restricted private circumstances of AIP and several other reoccurring dubious circumstances.
7) Primary Care Physicians whom are often the first defense a vulnerable person has against undue influence were changed at the onset of estate planning. Health records where not transferred to new PCP therefor VP’s medical history were not supplied to specialist doctors, clinical physiatrists and crucial medical diagnosis were not disclosed (fraudulently concealed) in neurocognitive evaluations, court ordered physician declarations and visitors reports.
8) Court ordered visitor (CV) company selected by respondent’s attorney in each case was the same company was used in all three cases. This court officer position is supposed to be neutral. CV company only does interviews and does not look at court documentation of contentions, CV assist in concealing imperative medical diagnosis that are not disclosed in court ordered Physician declarations and neurocognitive evaluations. CV company works with respondent’s attorney whom recommends or automatically motions their choice of guardianship or conservator company. In some cases, the attorney owns the conservator company and often awards guardianships to company’s in their affiliated professional network of geriatric service providers. Wrongful appropriation & illicit estate transfers continue. CV company’s owner where LSW also working at Hospital this consists of several ethical and CFR/CMS violations.
9) Assisting bankers, stock brokers/wealth managers, accountants, conservators and court appointed masters who disregard FINRA, SEC, Federal Acts, SSA XVIII, Elder Justice Act, NASAA, ABA, AARP, BSA, FINcen, State Code and ethical industry guidelines who mismanage funds, churn accounts facilitate in the illicit transfers of funds or signing of joint accounts and property transfers while the vulnerable person is unduly influenced/cognitively impaired.
10) Nations leading & other skilled expert’s testimony confirming undue influence is dismissed because exploiters attorney(s) claim testimony was paid for.
11) Family courts dockets are overwhelmed, the amount of paperwork involved when a vulnerable person is being unduly influenced by family and their advisors is voluminous. Illicit transactions are characteristic in these cases. Judges are unable to accurately discern the truth. Motions are passed based on the word or document submitted by the very attorney whom aided &abetted the illicit transfer(s), estate document drafting or clandestine chicanery in the first place.
12) The 3 vulnerable woman estates losses, illicit transfers, wrongful appropriation, theft, wasted legal fees for inept & dubious estate planning, proscribed guardianship expenses, interrelated health risks due reckless endangerment/negligence matters directly resulting from estate planning total at least $20 million. Exploitation altering the VP’s long-held intentions, isolation from family, friends, loss of civil & the most basic inalienable human rights.
Contact Us Directly For More Information: